Legal Opinion

Bynum v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 2018No. CR-18-205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

21. That during the above stated trial, the jury took notes, were attentive and were able [sic] placed in a position in which they were able to make informed decisions about the credibility *761of the witnesses, the evidence and allegations.

22. That in consideration of the totality of the allegations, court record, pleadings, transcripts and sentencing documents, the Court does hereby find that the defendant/petitioner has failed to meet his burden of proof and that his Petition For Relief Under Rule 37, Ark. R. Crim. P., is hereby denied/dismissed.

This appeal followed.

We do not reverse the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sartin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Lasiter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodney Dewayne Smith v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API