Legal Opinion

Daniel Gabino Martinez v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 4, 2013No. 11-751LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Fifth Amendment taking; statute of limitations; accrual date; impoundment and sale of cattle.

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Plaintiff Daniel Gabino Martinez seeks compensation under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution for the alleged taking of his cattle by the United States, acting through the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture. Plaintiff contends that the taking occurred when the Forest Service sold several hundred head of his cattle, seized by the Service because they allegedly were trespassing on federal land. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API