Legal Opinion

Fellows v. Tait

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1861PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Gourt,

Cole, J.

These are several applications on behalf of the appellants, Tait and Sherry, for an order directing the present judge of the tenth circuit to settle and sign bills of exceptions in the above causes. The actions were tried before the predecessor of the present j udge. The practice in this state has been for tbe person before whom a cause was tried to settle the bill of exceptions, although he was no longer judge. And it seems to us that he is the only person who can settle the bill of exceptions, for the plain reason that he alone knows what took place on the trial. How…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. M. K. & T. Railway Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Stirling v. WagnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Cressman v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Todd v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Burnett v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API