Legal Opinion
Britt v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1978No. L.A. 30786Published
1Opinion of the Court
20 Cal.3d 844 (1978)
574 P.2d 766
143 Cal. Rptr. 695
ROGER A. BRITT et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT, Real Party in Interest.
Docket No. L.A. 30786.
Supreme Court of California.
March 27, 1978.
COUNSEL
Fadem, Berger & McIntire, Fadem, Berger, McIntire & Norton, Michael M. Berger and Gregory M. Bergman for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Louis E. Goebel, Michael Scott Gatzke and Walter J. Cummings III for Real Party in Interest.
OPINION
TOBRINER, J.
In this case we must determine the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.