Legal Opinion

Corning v. Dreyfus

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ai tachment.

1Opinion of the CourtB lungs, J.

These causes are submitted together with reference to tl io distribution of the proceeds of property seized under atlaeh-men is. The questions are as to the claim of a creditor under an attach ment from the stale court, and as to the order of priority of creditor! obtaining attachments in this court. Various creditors had obts ined attachments on Sunday in this court, which were also levied on i lUiiday. The same and other creditors obtained attachments in sovc ral suits, also in this court, some early Monday morning, shortly afte' midnight, and others between 8 and 10 o’clock a. m., which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Turner v. AustinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  3. Hepp v. GloverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  4. Tufts v. CarradineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  5. Harmon v. JugeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. California Home Brands, Inc. And Pan Pacific Fisheries v. Danny FerreiraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Atoka Milling Co. v. GroomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Emert v. GroomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API