Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yenem Corp. v. 281 Broadway Holdings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 2010Published

1Dissent

Catterson, J. (dissenting).

I must respectfully dissent

because the provision at issue, though now part of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, had its origin in state law; therefore absolute liability may be imposed if a plaintiff can prove that violation of the provision was the proximate cause of injuries. Moreover, in this case, affidavits submitted by the defendants constitute written admissions that they violated the provision by failing to protect the adjoining structure during excavation operations. This failure proximately caused the structure to list more than three inches…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Elliott v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Dorrity v. . RappNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Major v. Waverly & Ogden, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Huerta v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API