Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Treviranus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1903Published

Appeal from special term, Rockland county. Action by Mary A. Arnold, individually and as executrix of Justin Arnold, deceased, against Sophie J. Treviranus, and judgment for plaintiff, and, from an order denying a motion to cancel the same of record, defendant appeals. Modified.

1Opinion of the CourtJenks, J.

The defendant owned certain realty subject to a mortgage, due in 1888, which she had assumed to pay. She defaulted. While in default, and in 1896, she conveyed three other pieces of realty to her son, the defendant Treviranus. In 1898, the plaintiff foreclosed the said mortgage, sold the premises under the decree, entered a deficiency judgment against the defendant in 1900, and later in that year began this suit to set aside as fraudulent said conveyances. made by defendant to Treviranus. In 1901, the defendant was adjudicated a bankrupt, and was discharged of her debts in bankruptcy. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. First National Bank v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. The Ocean National Bank v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Adsit v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Corning & Norton v. WhiteNew York Court of Chancery · 1831

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API