Kesai v. Almand
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentCourtney Hudson Henry, Justice
The issues raised in this appeal are procedurally barred due to the absence of an effective notice of appeal. As a result, the appeal must be dismissed, and I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to consider the merits of this ease despite a fatal defect in the notice of appeal.
Attorney Ken Swindle purports to appeal from an order entered by the Washington County Circuit Court assessing costs personally and solely against Swindle following the taking of a voluntary nonsuit by Swindle’s client, Kojleb Kesai, who had filed a claim for personal injury. The initial notice of appeal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Henry v. EberhardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Lilly v. EarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Lindsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.