Legal Opinion

Bates v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Workforce Development

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 23, 2009No. 08-cv-465-slcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

Plaintiff Gordan Bates is proceeding in forma pauperis on two claims: (1) that defendants discriminated against him because of his disability in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132 and (2) that defendants made fraudulent representations in violation of Wisconsin’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Wis. Stat. § 100.18. Jurisdiction is present. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 & 1367. Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which will be granted.

I conclude that no reasonable jury could find that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. David Baron v. City of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Kailin v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. Michael Goldstein v. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., A/K/A United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. K&S Tool & Die Corp. v. Perfection Machinery Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lipitz v. HurwitzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Bhatti v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
  3. Gaughan v. New American Funding LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
  4. ProSynthesis Laboratories, Inc. v. Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  5. Verde Environmental Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Verde v. C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API