Bates v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Workforce Development
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gordan Bates is proceeding in forma pauperis on two claims: (1) that defendants discriminated against him because of his disability in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132 and (2) that defendants made fraudulent representations in violation of Wisconsin’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Wis. Stat. § 100.18. Jurisdiction is present. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 & 1367. Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which will be granted.
I conclude that no reasonable jury could find that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- David Baron v. City of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Kailin v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Michael Goldstein v. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., A/K/A United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- K&S Tool & Die Corp. v. Perfection Machinery Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lipitz v. HurwitzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Bhatti v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Gaughan v. New American Funding LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- ProSynthesis Laboratories, Inc. v. Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Verde Environmental Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Verde v. C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020