Aronette Manufacturing Co. v. Capitol Piece Dye Works, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Conway.
Aronette Manufacturing Company, the plaintiff-respondent, is a manufacturer of raincoats. In December, 1950 Aronette agreed to purchase textiles from Burlington Mills Avhich textiles were already treated to be “ crease resistant ” but not made water repellant. Burlington Mills agreed to send the goods for plaintiff to appellant Capitol Piece Dye Works, a waterproofer of textiles, to make the goods Avater repellant Avith a 1 £ Zelan ’ ’ process and then ship them to Aronette. The president of Aronette, who was apprehensive of *467purchasing “ crease resistant” goods and then…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Collins v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Klar v. H. & M. Parcel Room, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Wintringham v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Douglass v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Ruben PereaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Fabric Garment Co., Inc., Mayflower Manufacturing Corp., Joseph Abrams and Murray BermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Green v. KosloskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Dick v. ReeseIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Edward Snyder v. Four Winds Sailboat Centre, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.