Legal Opinion · Dissent
Elkins v. Schaaf
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1940No. 27661Published
1DissentSimpson, J.
(dissenting) — The complaint to which the demurrer was sustained states:
“That none of the plaintiffs are now engaged nor have they been engaged as common carriers in the State of Washington, and none of them have undertaken to transport property for the general public by motor vehicle for compensation, either over regular routes or on regular or irregular schedules. That plaintiffs and neither of them are persons who, under special or individual contracts or agreements, transport property by motor vehicle for compensation. The plaintiffs and neither of them are persons engaged exclusively or…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.