Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Banks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1999PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is a direct appeal from the denial of Appellant’s second Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. Because we find that Appellant’s petition was untimely filed in violation of the recently amended Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545, we affirm the common pleas court’s order denying relief in this capital case.

On June 21, 1983, George Emil Banks, Appellant, was convicted of twelve counts of murder in the first degree and received twelve consecutive death sentences. 1 A direct appeal was taken and our Court affirmed the convictions and judgments of sentence.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Banks v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. Gamboa-TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins, Warden the District Attorney of the County of Bucks the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. BreakironSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API