Legal Opinion

State v. White

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1987No. C9-86-1919Published

1Opinion of the Court

411 N.W.2d 196 (1987)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Carl E. WHITE, Appellant,

No. C9-86-1919.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 18, 1987.

Review Denied October 21, 1987.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin Co. Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Paul R. Jennings, Asst. Co. Attys., Minneapolis, for respondent.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, Steven P. Russett, Asst. State Public Defender, St. Paul, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and FOLEY and RANDALL, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Carl White…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API