CURTIS W. v. State

Curtis W:, a juvenile, appeals from a non-final order 1 waiving juvenile jurisdiction over him. Curtis claims that: (1) the juvenile court lost competency to proceed because of a violation of the time requirement contained in § 48.21(l)(a), STATS.; (2) the juvenile court erred in denying Curtis's motion for a hearing on the issue of prosecutive merit; and (3) the juvenile court erred in finding that it would be in the best interest of the public and Curtis to waive juvenile court jurisdiction. Because: (1) the time requirement of § 48.21(l)(a) was not violated; (2) the juvenile court did not…