Legal Opinion

State v. Skamfer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 14, 1993No. 92-1932-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.

The principal issue on appeal is whether Matthew C. Skamfer's commitment to a mental institution upon a finding of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect rendered him a "prisoner" within the meaning of the battery by prisoners statute, sec. 940.20(1), Stats. We hold it did.

Skamfer also asserts that the trial court committed statutory and constitutional error by refusing to appoint a psychiatrist on his behalf following his plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. We reject the statutory component of this argument on the basis of existing case law. We deem the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. KoputWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. MacLin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SzulczewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. VerhagenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. State v. AsmusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  4. State v. SzulczewskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. State v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API