Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Gorlick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1958No. 34385PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is an action to recover alleged preferences made during the four-month period immediately preceding the filing of an application for the appointment of a receiver. It is brought under the authority of Laws of 1941, chapter 103, § 3, p. 272 [cf. RCW 23.48.030] which provides:

“Any preference made or suffered within four (4) months before the date of application for the appointment of a receiver may be avoided and the property or its value recovered by the receiver. No preferences made or suffered prior to such four (4) months’ period may be recovered, and all provisions of law or of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carlson v. KiesWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Mills v. Virginia-Carolina Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
  3. Phillips v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rugger v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Zimmerli v. Northern Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Viewcrest Cooperative Assoc. v. DeerWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Watkins v. SweeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sterling Savings Bank v. Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API