Legal Opinion

Van Woesik v. Pacific Coca-Cola Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1988No. WCB 84-09431; CA A36863PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in the light of Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or 345, 745 P2d 775 (1987). Claimant had been awarded benefits totaling 30 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability for a back injury. In our previous opinion, Van Woesik v. Pacific Coca-Cola Co., 85 Or App 9, 735 P2d 1232 (1987), we affirmed the Board’s determination that claimant had not suffered an aggravation sufficient to qualify for additional benefits under ORS 656.273.

The first issue on remand is whether the last arrangement of compensation, a stipulated agreement dated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mathis v. Modoc Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Van Woesik v. Pacific Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lucas v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API