Legal Opinion

Millicent Hinds v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 9, 2026No. 3:25-cv-15474Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MILLICENT HINDS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-15474 (RK) (JTQ) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, Defendant. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff Millicent Hinds’s (“Plaintiff”) application to proceed in forma pauperis, (“IFP,” ECF No. 1-2), together with Plaintiff’s Complaint against Sun Pharmaceutical Industries (“Defendant”), (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP is GRANTED, and the Complaint is DISMISSED without…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Allah v. SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API