Legal Opinion

D. F. Saunders v. Alamo Soil Conservation District

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1976No. 15653PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs, D. F. Saunders and wife, Pauline Ruth Saunders, from a summary judgment rendered in favor of defendants, Alamo Soil Conservation District and San Antonio River Authority (SARA), denying plaintiffs’ recovery for damages allegedly done to their land as a result of the activities of defendants.

Plaintiffs alleged that on February 1, 1962, defendants “entered into a contract with Plaintiffs for an easement over Plaintiffs’ property,” and that such easement expired “by its own terms on February 1, 1967, for the reason that no improvements had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. State v. Keeton Packing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. McCarthy v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. McMullen Oil and Royalty Company v. LyssyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Guinn v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boy Scouts of America v. Responsive Terminal Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Hall v. Hubco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  3. Ivey Hugh Rutherford v. Exxon Company, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Clark v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Love v. Woerndell, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API