Legal Opinion
Reed v. ST CLAIR RUBBER CO.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1982No. Docket 56603Published
1Opinion of the Court
118 Mich. App. 1 (1982)
324 N.W.2d 512
REED
v.
ST CLAIR RUBBER COMPANY
Docket No. 56603.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided July 13, 1982.
Vandeveer, Garzia, Tonkin, Kerr & Heaphy, P.C. (by C.F. Boyle, Jr.), for St. Clair Rubber Company.
Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt, Watters, Stanczyk & Pedersen (by James R. Kohl), for Hoover Chemicals, Inc.
Before: MacKENZIE, P.J., and BRONSON and T.R. THOMAS,[*] JJ.
2Per curiam
Third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted in the St. Clair County Circuit Court for third-party plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant third-party…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.