Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. Courier-Journal, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 19, 2016No. 2012-CA-000179-MR; NO. 2012-CA-000356-MR; NO. 2014-CA-000540-MRPublished

1Dissent

TAYLOR, JUDGE,

DISSENTING:

I fully concur with the majority affirming the award of -attorneys’ 'fees and costs and agree that the Cabinet acted willfully within the meaning of KRS 61.882(5). However, I respectfully dissent as concerns the award of penalties under KRS 61.882(5) and would remand for further proceedings thereon. My reasoning follows.

KRS 61.882(5) provides that a person may be awarded'up to $25 “for each day that he was deified the right to inspect or copy said public record.” The circuit court interpreted KRS 61.882(5) to permit an award of up to $25 per day for each particular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flying J Travel Plaza v. Commonwealth, Transportation Cabinet, Department of HighwaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Stopher v. ConliffeKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hodge v. ColemanKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  5. Monumental Life Insurance Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API