Legal Opinion

Stopher v. Conliffe

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2005No. 20030-SC-0710-OAPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice KELLER.

I. ISSUE

Petitioner filed an RCr 11.42 motion and requested an ex parte hearing under KRS 31.185 at which he would seek funds for an expert to support his motion. The trial court denied Petitioner’s request, and he now petitions this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to conduct an ex parte hearing on his request for such funds. Because we find that the statutory entitlement to funds for an expert does not extend to post-conviction proceedings, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

II. BACKGROUND

Petitioner was convicted of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stopher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Beckham v. Bd. of Educ. of Jefferson Cty.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Revenue Cabinet v. O'DANIELKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Haight v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Foley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Hall v. Hospitality Resources, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. BussellKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Carter v. SmithKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Randy Haight v. Scott JordanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API