Legal Opinion

Pinkerton's v. Manriquez

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 29, 1998No. 14-96-00560-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

YATES, Justice.

Appellant, Pinkerton’s d/b/a Pinkerton Security Investigation Services (“Pinkerton”), appeals a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of appellee, David Manriquez (“Manriquez”), for personal injuries sustained when he attempted to assist the owner of a stalled vehicle by pushing the vehicle up an incline of a parking garage. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and render a judgment that Manriquez take nothing on his claims against Pinkerton.

I. Background

In February 1991, Manriquez worked as a general maintenance person for Pedus Building Services (“Pedus”),…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ambrosio v. Carter's Shooting Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Villegas v. Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sholl, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  4. Military Highway Water Supply Corp. v. Morin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Petri v. Kestrel Oil & Gas Properties, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API