Legal Opinion

Craddock v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided March 21, 2001No. 10-00-232-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Carey Michael Craddock was arrested for possession of a controlled substance. Craddock was completing a seven year probationary deferred adjudication sentence for a burglary of a habitation. Craddock entered a plea of guilty. Craddock appeals. Craddock is represented by retained counsel. Counsel filed a brief which asserts: “Counsel for Appellant has studied the clerk’s record of the trial and find [sic] no clear error which was preserved for appeal.” In essence, retained counsel has filed what appears to be an Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1896, 18…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Taulung v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  4. Oldham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rivera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  3. Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  4. Albertico Cruz v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2023
  5. Alec Nava v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API