Legal Opinion
Horneman v. Giles
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1980No. 14046PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Judge.
In this boundary action (LSA-C.C.P. Arts. 3691-3693; LSA-C.C. Arts. 784-796), the defendant and the intervenor (defendant’s vendor and mortgagee) appeal from a judgment of the district court establishing the boundary between plaintiffs’ property in Section 16, T 23 N, R 14 W, and defendant’s property in Section 15, in accordance with a survey prepared by plaintiffs’ surveyor, Albritton. We affirm'the judgment for the reasons set forth in the trial court’s written reasons for judgment. The trial court found that the methods employed by the plaintiffs’ two surveyors, who started…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. AlmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Bodcaw Co. v. SpurlinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gibson v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Fournet Land Co. v. Martin Fish Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Bodcaw Co. v. SpurlinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williamson v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Barham v. Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Horneman v. GilesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Reed v. WallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986