Smith v. Almond
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
Plaintiff and defendant are the owners of contiguous estates. One of plaintiff’s estates lies in section 9, township 12 north, range 9 west, and one of defendant’s in section 8 of the same township and range; the section line common to sections 8 and 9 being the boundary between these two estates. The other of plaintiff’s estates lies in the N. % of the N. W. Vi of section 8, in the aforesaid township and range, and the other of defendant’s in the S. % of the N. W. Vt of that township and range; the line dividing tlie N. % of the N. W. % from the S. % of the N. W. % of section 8, being the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Barham v. Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Bodcaw Co. v. SpurlinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gibson v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- TEXAS INTERN. PETRO. CORP. v. Delacroix Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Deshotels v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.