Ryalls v. Smith
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.
The plaintiffs were in an automobile which was in collision with another in a passing accident. Recovery is sought by the passengers against the defendant, the driver of the car overtaken. The evidence tends to show that the accident came about as follows: While proceeding northerly on Route 5, near Bellows Falls at about 5 :30 in the afternoon while it was still light, George Ryalls, husband and father of the respective plaintiffs, drove his car up behind the automobile operated by the defendant which was travelling in the same direction. After the Ryalls vehicle had followed the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Knight v. WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Alexander v. ChevalierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- In Re Campbell's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Enos v. Owens Slate Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Akron Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- West-Nesbitt, Inc. v. RandallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Hebert v. StanleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Akron Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Catherine Lyons v. Chittenden Central Supervisory UnionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.