Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge
This action, involving plaintiffs claim that the Government breached an implied-in-fact contract which allegedly arose from the detention of certain merchandise by United States Customs Service personnel comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plain*425tiffs opposition thereto. Because we essentially agree with the Government’s argument concerning the clear congressional intent to retain sovereign immunity with regard to claims arising out of detentions of materials by customs inspectors, we hold that plaintiffs petition does not state a claim upon which relief can…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Insurance Co. of North America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- KingUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Midland National Bank v. ConlogueDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.