Legal Opinion

Clinton v. 4911 Van Nuys Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1963No. Civ. No. 26329PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

This is an appeal by Richard H. Clinton (“Clinton”) and Joan F. Clinton from a judgment rendered against them as cross-complainants and in favor of cross-defendants 4911 Van Nuys Building, a limited partnership, Van-River, Inc., a California corporation, George A. Cordingly, Sr., president of Van-River, Inc. (collectively referred to herein as “Van Nuys”), Holland and Card House Movers, *704J. C. Holland and O. F. Card (collectively referred to herein as “Holland”). The court adjudged that cross-complainants take nothing by reason of their cross-complaint and that cross-defendants have judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seay v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Lewis v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clinton v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API