Legal Opinion

Kamyk v. Berryhill

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 18, 2017No. 16-3647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Kazimiera Kamyk, a Polish citizen and permanent resident of the United States, appeals the district court’s judgment affirming a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to reduce her retirement benefits based on her receipt of a pension from Poland. Because substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision, we affirm.

For 25 years Kamyk worked in a firm controlled by the Polish government, all the while paying into the Polish pension system, Zaklad Ubezpieczeñ Spoleczynych (ZUS). In 1992 she immigrated to the United States, obtained work that year, and began paying Social…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ralph Stroup v. Jo Ane B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Petersen v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. David Rudykoff v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lorraine Beeler v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Lorraine Beeler v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Lorraine Beeler v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API