Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Carruth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 11, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

These are four appeals taken by different next of kin from a decree of the Probate Court admitting to probate the will of Charles Herbert Pratt.

Two issues were framed by a single justice of this court* to be tried by a jury. These issues were: “First. Was the alleged will now offered for probate executed according to law?” “Second. Was the said Charles H. Pratt of sound and disposing mind and memory at the time of the execution of the said alleged will? ”

When these two issues came on for trial, “the appellants agreed that the court might withdraw from the jury the second issue above noted,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Dorr v. Tremort National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Priest v. Inhabitants of GrotonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Conant v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Rowe v. RennickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Porter v. BallouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Di Fruscio v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Putnam v. NeubrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API