Legal Opinion

Bruzzone v. United States Attorney of Northern California District

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 15, 2023No. 4:22-cv-06412Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL A BRUZZONE, Case No. 22-cv-06412-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO EXPAND 9 v. PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDERS 10 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OF Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 19, 32 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court are the United States Attorney for the Northern District of 14 California’s (“Defendant” or “Government”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 14, “MTD”) and motion 15 to expand pre-filing review orders (Dkt. No. 19, “Review Order Mot.”) as well as pro se…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API