State v. Hageman

*288Judge Becton,

dissenting in part and concurring in part.

I have no quarrel with the majority’s resolution of 80CRS51100 — defendant’s conviction of receiving a stolen ring. However, believing that the sterling silver items lost their character as stolen goods when they were recovered and retained for twelve days by the police, I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion finding “no error in the trial court’s submission of the issue of attempted receipt of stolen goods.” Ante, page 14. I am not persuaded, as is the majority, by the “reasoning of the Supreme Court of California, in People…