Legal Opinion

Guffee v. Crockett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliNsox

A high school owned and operated by Williamson County in its 9th Civil • District was destroyed by fire. To replace this high school, it became necessary for Williamson County to issue and sell its school bonds designated “High School Bonds of Williamson County”. The bonds were issued under authority of the provisions of T.C.A. Code Sections 5-1101 — 5-1124 and 49-701 — 49-720 construed in pari materia, as directed by Southern v. Beeler, 183 Tenn. 272, 292, 195 S.W.2d 857. For the payment of these bonds, principal and interest, the County is obligated by the bond issue resolution to levy an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southern v. Beeler, Atty.-Gen.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Harned v. MeadorTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Crewse v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. McCord v. Marshall CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Staggs v. Herff Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Board of Education v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. City of Elizabethton v. BooneTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Phillips v. Anderson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Moody v. Williamson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API