Legal Opinion
Winston Holloway v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1984No. 83-1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing plaintiffs federal tort claims action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with orders of the court.
On December 21, 1981, plaintiff, an inmate at the federal penitentiary in Leavenworth, Kansas, brought this action against the United States pursuant to the Federal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Shirley NULF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Stanley v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Howard W. Joplin, D/B/A American Research Pest Control Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Carl E. Bills, in His Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of A. Larue Lamb v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Craighead v. Hutton & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- North American University v. State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992