Eureka Coal Co. v. McGowan
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller
Defendant in error was plaintiff in a suit to have a receiver appointed for plaintiff in error, defendant below, and had judgment appointing a receiver. The cause is now before us on error.
From the record it appears that plaintiff and one Hoye furnished an equal amount of funds to open and operate a coal mine, for the working of which they incorporated the defendant company. Each was to have 3400 shares of the capital stock of said company, of the par value of $10. E. J. Churchill, in his lifetime, was the counsel of the company, and with the two persons named formed the board of directors.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. Bank of LeadvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- D. A. Tompkins Co. v. Catawba MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1897
- Boyle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Sternberg v. WolffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Jasper Land Co. v. Wallis & CarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krall v. KrallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Salnita Corp. v. Walter Holding Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Laskey v. L. & L. Manchester Drive-In, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Savageau v. J. & R. A. Savageau, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Eldridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users' Assn.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930