Legal Opinion

Eureka Coal Co. v. McGowan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1922No. 10,336PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

Defendant in error was plaintiff in a suit to have a receiver appointed for plaintiff in error, defendant below, and had judgment appointing a receiver. The cause is now before us on error.

From the record it appears that plaintiff and one Hoye furnished an equal amount of funds to open and operate a coal mine, for the working of which they incorporated the defendant company. Each was to have 3400 shares of the capital stock of said company, of the par value of $10. E. J. Churchill, in his lifetime, was the counsel of the company, and with the two persons named formed the board of directors.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Bank of LeadvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. D. A. Tompkins Co. v. Catawba MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1897
  3. Boyle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Sternberg v. WolffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  5. Jasper Land Co. v. Wallis & CarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krall v. KrallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Salnita Corp. v. Walter Holding Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  3. Laskey v. L. & L. Manchester Drive-In, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  4. Savageau v. J. & R. A. Savageau, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Eldridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users' Assn.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API