Legal Opinion

Brown v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 27, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Transferred from Kansas City Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMabshall, J.

— This is an action for damages under section 2612, Bevised Statutes 1889, for the killing of the plaintiff’s horse, and for a reasonable attorney’s fee under section 2613, Bevised Statutes 1889. The answer admits that the defendant is a corporation and that it owns and operates a railroad, and then denies generally all the allegations of the petition. The case was tried in the circuit court, before a jury, who returned the following verdict on the 19th of September, 1898: “We the jury, And for the plaintiff and assess his damage at $25.” Thereupon the jury was discharged and a judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Perkins v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Paddock v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Ash v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. Pim v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Curtice v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Schildnecht v. City of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Haag v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Syz v. Milk Wagon Drivers' Union, Local 603Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Stribling v. JolleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API