Legal Opinion
United States v. Ernesto Rivas-Gonzalez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 27, 2004No. 03-30167PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed April 22, 2004, and found at 365 F.3d 806, is hereby amended as follows:(1) We delete the last paragraph reading:
Having concluded that the district court erred when it departed downward based on cultural assimilation, we do not reach or address the district court’s second ground for departure, based on family ties, and we express no view on whether and to what extent the departure might properly have been made on that ground. We do not address this issue because we cannot divine whether the district court would have departed and how it would have fashioned Rivas’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Devon LIPMAN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Higinia Martinez-De Bojorquez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Ernesto Rivas-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Melendez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Juan Humberto Tzoc-SierraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jae Hee KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.