Legal Opinion

Texada v. Spence

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 4, 1928No. 28893PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Certain heirs of Mrs. Mattie Texada Neal sued to annul her will so far as it constitutes Walter L. Spence her residuary legatee and appoints him testamentary executor. The court below rejected their demands, and they have appealed.

The facts are as follows, viz.:

Walter D. Spence and Mrs. Sarilla O. Spence were husband and wife and lived together as such at the matrimonial domicile in the parish of Natchitoches. During her temporary absence on a visit to relatives in the state of Illinois, upon the fraudulent allegation that her departure was permanent, and that prior thereto she had been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Succession of JahrausSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Zerega v. PercivalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  3. State Ex Rel. Peter v. StangaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Succession of McDermottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. Gauff v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schwegmann v. SchwegmannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Succession of FranzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Guidry v. HardyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Succession of HersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Succession of LannesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API