Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 9, 2007No. 06-2079PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Wayne Jackson contends that the federal district court charged with assessing an appropriate sentence for his participation in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine erred by • considering his .prior uncounseled state misdemeanor sentences for domestic violence and the negligent use of a firearm, and that this error implicates his Sixth. Amendment right to counsel. Our case law and repeated guidance from the Supreme Court, however, instruct that a federal sentencing court may, consistent with the Sixth Amendment, take into account a defendant’s previous uncounseled…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. A.B.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. JarviCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Acuna-ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. NaramorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API