Legal Opinion

Hacker v. Barnes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1932No. 23578. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBears, J.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of chapter 165, Laws of 1927, p. 158, “An act relating to and providing for the prevention and eradication of diseases of domestic animals,” etc., as amended by chapter 210, Laws of 1929, p. 559, with particular reference to those provisions of the acts which provide for the application of the so-called “tuberculin test” to bovine animals, for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the cattle subjected to the test are infected with tuberculosis.

Plaintiff filed this action against the state director of agriculture and two of his subordinate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Decano v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cory v. NetheryWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Coelho v. TruckellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Swedish Hospital v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Affonso Bros. v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API