Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Fletcher

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1916No. 9,083PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Lake Circuit Court; W. C. McMahan, Judge. Action by Nathan- Fletcher against Harry Hollander. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNutt, J.

1. This was a suit by appellee against appellant on a promissory note, a copy of which is set out in the complaint. Appellant, by his first assignment of error, attacks the sufficiency of the complaint for the first time in this court. The suit was begun in the court below, in the April term, 1914, which was long after. §§1, 85 and 89 of an act concerning proceedings in civil actions, approved April 7, 1881 (Acts 1881 [s.s.] p. 240, §§249, 339, 343 R. S. 1881, §§249, 344, 348 Burns 1908), as amended by the Act of 1911 .(Acts 1911 p. 415, §§249, 344, 348 Burns 1914) were in force. Section 89,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jeffersonville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Stiles v. HaslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FrazeIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Atkinson v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Globe Mining Co. v. Oak Ridge Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Frank Bird Transfer Co. v. ShawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API