Legal Opinion

Frank Bird Transfer Co. v. Shaw

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1919No. 9,958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Marion Superior Court (98,098); Theophilus J. Moll, Judge. ■ Action by Elmer Shaw against the Frank Bird Transfer Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the'defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

—Action by appellee against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him through the negligence of appellant in backing an automobile against him.

There was a judgment for appellee. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled and exception reserved. The only errors assigned which we need to consider are: (1) That the amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial.

1. Many of the points in appellant’s brief are mere abstract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. EadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Martin v. LillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stiles v. HaslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Hollander v. FletcherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indiana Railways & Light Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API