Legal Opinion

Courchesne v. Town of Weathersfield

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 30, 2003No. 02-453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the Windsor Superior Court granting summary judgment to defendant Town of Weathersfield, a Vermont municipality, on plaintiffs’ claims that the Town acted illegally and tortiously interfered with a business relationship. The court determined that the Town was entitled to sovereign immunity for its actions because it did not exceed the scope of its authority when it leased a gravel pit and entered into a gravel pit management agreement. We affirm.

¶ 2. Plaintiff Andrew Courchesne was, at all relevant times, the sole shareholder and sole employee of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co. v. Town of HinesburgSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. Bates v. BassettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  3. Morway v. TromblySupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Lucia v. Village of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  5. Graham v. Town of DuxburySupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grice v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Sobel v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. John H. Belter, Jr. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  4. Felix v. Spaulding High Sch. Union Dist.Vermont Superior Court · 2010
  5. Grice v. Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API