Legal Opinion

Sobel v. City of Rutland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 12, 2012No. 2011-436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiffs, Doctors Eitan and Vered Sobel, owners of a medical office building in Rutland, appeal the superior court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant, City of Rutland. Plaintiffs sued the City for damages, claiming the City Tax Assessor (the Assessor) was negligent in providing allegedly inaccurate property tax estimates on the proposed, but not yet built, office. Plaintiffs also sought to enjoin the City from enforcing the tax assessment on the office building ultimately constructed. On appeal, they argue that the court erred in concluding that their negligence claim was barred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co. v. Town of HinesburgSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. Campbell v. StaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Town of Victory v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. Town of Brattleboro v. NowickiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. Chandler and Chandler Electric Company, Chandler v. Concord Group Insurance Company and Campbell & Boyd Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Simuro v. SheddDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2016
  3. Connelly v. City of St. Albans, VermontDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024
  4. DeVita Subdivision Amendment - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2018
  5. Stephen C. Bellows v. Grand Isle County Sheriff’s Department, et al.District Court, D. Vermont · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API