Legal Opinion

City of West Helena v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 2003No. 02-1154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

The City of West Helena, along with the members of the West Helena City Council, and the City’s mayor, bring this interlocutory appeal from the circuit court’s grant of class certification under Rule 23 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 2(a)(9) (2003). Because the action brought against the City is an illegal-exaction suit, it is a constitutionally created class action as a matter of law. Pursuant to our recent holding in T&T Chemical, Inc. v. Priest, 351 Ark. 537, 95 S.W.3d 750 (2003), we dismiss the appeal for lack of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Worth v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Hall v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. T&T Chemical, Inc. v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Austin v. Centerpoint Energy ArklaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API