Legal Opinion

T&T Chemical, Inc. v. Priest

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 2003No. 02-286PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial .court’s denial of a petition for certification under the provisions of Rule 23 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. On November 30, 1999, appellant, T&T Chemical, Inc. (“T&T”), brought an action against appellees, Sharon Priest, Secretary of State, and Jimmie Lou Fisher, State Treasurer, alleging that appehees wrongfully collected a six-dollar increase in the annual corporate franchise tax from T&T and similarly situated taxpayers for 1993 and subsequent years. That case is still pending before the trial court as an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Worth v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Frank v. BarkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Grandjean v. GrandjeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Hamilton v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Allen v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Parker v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Butt v. Evans Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API