St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
The purpose of this proceeding is to procure a declaratory judgment or decree as to whether the St. Paul Company or the Louisville Company, or both, is liable to" pay a loss sustained by W. O. Johnson.
This is the third appeal in this cause. We affirmed the decree overruling the demurrer in Louisville Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 252 Ala. 532, 41 So.2d 585. A trial on the merits before the circuit court in equity without a jury resulted in a decree holding each company liable and prorating the. loss equally between them. That’ decree was appealed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Snow v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Independent Life Ins. Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Bondurant v. Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Gardiner v. WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Hall v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Abbott v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Casey v. KrumpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Abbott v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.