Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1953No. 6 Div. 481PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

The purpose of this proceeding is to procure a declaratory judgment or decree as to whether the St. Paul Company or the Louisville Company, or both, is liable to" pay a loss sustained by W. O. Johnson.

This is the third appeal in this cause. We affirmed the decree overruling the demurrer in Louisville Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 252 Ala. 532, 41 So.2d 585. A trial on the merits before the circuit court in equity without a jury resulted in a decree holding each company liable and prorating the. loss equally between them. That’ decree was appealed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Snow v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Bondurant v. Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  5. Gardiner v. WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Hall v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Abbott v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Casey v. KrumpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Abbott v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API