Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bluestone v. Mathewson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1982No. 13309Published

1Concurrence

BISTLINE, Justice,

specially concurring.

This $390 lawsuit will have a lasting impact on the practice of law in Idaho under what commonly are referred to as the “Federal Rules” of Civil Procedure. For that reason I concur in the Court’s opinion insofar as it holds that the failure to plead an affirmative defense does not across-the-board constitute a waiver of that defense which precludes it from being raised later. This is a commendable holding and strongly reinforces my own view of the “Federal Rules” as set forth in a number of opinions. It has been suggested that an absence of prejudice is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cook v. SoltmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Harbaugh v. Myron Harbaugh Motor, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Trosper v. RaymondIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API