Gignilliat v. Borg
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentPannell, Judge
1.. I dissent from the majority opinion which decides, as the controlling principle in the case, that a representation by a seller that land he proposed to sell is zoned residential is an expression of legal opinion, rather than a statement of fact. I grant that zoning by a city or county, or any other governmental body, is a legislative function, and that the determination of whether a particular ordinance does or does not zone, may be a matter involving the construction of a law; but the mere statement that certain land is zoned for a certain use is a statement or representation of fact,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Elliott v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Dorsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Fenley v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Reid v. FlippenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Braselton Bros. v. Better Maid Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.